top of page
Laura Kasting

The Complexity of Eco-Friendly Packaging

Updated: Jun 21


Rethinking "Green" Packaging: The Unseen Environmental Toll

In the global race towards sustainability, businesses and consumers alike are championing eco-friendly packaging as a vital step forward. Yet, beneath the surface of these well-intentioned efforts lies a complex reality: not all eco-friendly packaging is as benign as it seems. Particularly concerning the issue of deforestation—a grave environmental consequence of certain "green" packaging materials. 

 

Sustainable Skincare Packaging_Coastside Skin

The Challenge of Finding Optimal Packaging

When pondering the optimal strategies for packaging our products, the inherent complexity of the matter often feels daunting. Transitioning away from plastic and single-use products appears filled with challenges at every turn. Despite these obstacles, we feel glass emerges as a potentially superior alternative, primarily due to its natural decomposability over time. Which is why we have primarily opted to use it for majority of our products. We do our best to eliminate as much plastic from our packaging as possible, but these choices have unearthed a complex web of pro’s and cons which has prompted further examination: 


Is glass indeed the ultimate solution, or does its journey from production to recycling harbor overlooked drawbacks? 


The Pros and Cons of Glass Packaging

The environmental impact of packaging materials is a significant concern, with plastics being notorious for their durability and persistence in ecosystems. According to the United Nations Environment Programme, millions of tons of plastics end up in the oceans every year, contributing to habitat destruction and endangering marine life. On the other hand, glass, made from abundant natural resources like sand, soda ash, and limestone, presents a more environmentally benign option. It is 100% recyclable and can be repurposed indefinitely without loss of quality, as reported by the Glass Packaging Institute

 

However, the benefits of glass must be weighed against its downsides. The production process for glass is energy-intensive, requiring high temperatures to melt the raw materials. This can lead to a larger carbon footprint compared to some plastics when not managed efficiently. Additionally, the weight and fragility of glass can increase transportation costs and the risk of breakage, potentially offsetting some of its environmental advantages.


Everytime we design, test and purchase packaging, so many of these questions pop up. What is the best choice? And as a small business, can we afford it?

 

The Double-Edged Sword of Plant-Based Packaging

The allure of plant-based packaging materials is undeniable. They promise a departure from the environmentally damaging, non-biodegradable plastics that have long dominated our landfills and oceans. However, as we delve deeper, the stark implications of this shift become evident. For instance, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) highlights the intricate relationship between deforestation and the demand for agricultural land, which includes land for growing packaging material like bamboo and pulp for paper (Source: WWF). Forests, the earth's lungs, are being decimated at an alarming rate. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations reports that approximately 420 million hectares of forest—an area larger than the European Union—were lost to deforestation between 1990 and 2020 (Source: FAO). This deforestation is driven not only by the need for agricultural land but also by the demand for raw materials, including those used in supposedly eco-friendly packaging. 

 

Examining Bamboo and Paper Packaging

Bamboo is often celebrated for its fast growth and sustainability. Yet, the environmental cost of converting natural forests into bamboo plantations is rarely discussed. Such practices result in significant biodiversity loss, as monoculture plantations cannot support the varied forms of life that diverse forests can. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) stresses the importance of biodiversity for ecosystem health and resilience, underscoring what's at stake when forests are felled for single-use packaging (Source: IUCN). Similarly, while paper packaging might seem like a better alternative to plastics, its production is fraught with ecological pitfalls. The process is not only water-intensive but also a significant source of pollution. Moreover, the reliance on virgin pulp contributes to deforestation, undermining the environmental benefits of paper recycling. The Environmental Paper Network's 'State of the Global Paper Industry' report calls for more responsible sourcing and production practices to mitigate these impacts (Source: Environmental Paper Network). 

 

Advocating for True Sustainability

The path towards genuinely sustainable packaging requires a multifaceted approach. First and foremost, companies must adopt more comprehensive sustainability practices, considering the entire lifecycle of packaging materials—from sourcing through to disposal. The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) offers certification to help consumers identify products made with materials from responsibly managed forests, promoting more sustainable forestry practices (Source: FSC). Additionally, reducing overall packaging use and embracing minimalist designs can significantly decrease environmental impact. Innovations in packaging, such as reusable and refillable systems, represent a promising way forward, potentially eliminating the need for disposable materials altogether. Which is what we as a company are aiming for, but it’s complex with MOQ’s (minimum order quantities) and making the refillable stage seamless for the consumer. Not to mention the battles we’ve had through the R&D phase with finding packaging that works with the viscosity of the product in relation to ease of use. Nothing is as quite straightforward as it seems.


Emerging materials technology also offers hope. Research into alternatives like mycelium-based packaging and algae-derived plastics could pave the way for solutions that are both sustainable and free from the burden of deforestation. (Ellen MacArthur Foundation). 

 

Conclusion

So, as we navigate the complexities of sustainable skincare packaging, it's crucial to look beyond the surface and understand the broader environmental implications of our choices. By supporting responsible practices, advocating for innovation (this is my favourite), and prioritizing truly sustainable materials, businesses and consumers can contribute to a more environmentally responsible future. Let's not allow our quest for eco-friendly solutions inadvertently harm the very planet we're trying to protect.


Hope you learned something!

Love, LK



Comments


bottom of page